Christopher O'Connell vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. O'Connell vs N. Fatic

Christopher O'Connell

AUS

5

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

115

C. Rank

225

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$2.1M

Career Money

$74.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Nerman Fatic

BIH

5

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

115

C. Rank

225

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$2.1M

Career Money

$74.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: O'Connell 5 - 0 Fatic

They have played 11 sets in total, with Christopher O'Connell winning 10 and Nerman Fatic winning 1. The last match between Christopher O'Connell and Nerman Fatic was at the Split Challenger, 13-04-2023, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Christopher O'Connell getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
O'Connell	5
Fatic	0

Last 5 H2H Matches:

(R2) Split Challenger(04-13-23)

Stats

Christopher O'Connell

Nerman Fatic

(QF) M25 Kiseljak(06-02-19)

Stats

Christopher O'Connell

Nerman Fatic

(SF) M25 Doboj(05-18-19)

Stats

Christopher O'Connell

Nerman Fatic

C. O'Connell vs N. Fatic H2H Profile

C. O'Connell	Stats	N. Fatic
$2,140,040	Career Prize Money	$73,995
60.18% (411-272)	Career Total W/L	58.47% (404-287)
5	Clay	0
15	Titles	12
5	Total H2H Matches	0
39.39% (13-20)	YTD Win/Loss	0.00% (0-1)

C. O'Connell vs N. Fatic Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Christopher O'Connell has won 46.03% of points on their second serve, while Nerman Fatic has won 45.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Christopher O'Connell, in recent form, has won 42.65% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nerman Fatic has won 46.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.54% and 27.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Christopher O'Connell has saved 57.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nerman Fatic has saved 53.03% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Christopher O'Connell has won 45.10% of matches played (W/L 23/28), with Nerman Fatic winning 72.31% (W/L 47/18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Christopher O'Connell has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 169/94), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 21/21). Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Christopher O'Connell has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44.83% of matches (W/L 13/16), where as Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Christopher O'Connell winning 5 times and Nerman Fatic being victorious 0 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Christopher O'Connell winning 10 and Nerman Fatic winning 1.
The last match between Christopher O'Connell and Nerman Fatic was at the Split Challenger, 13-04-2023, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Christopher O'Connell getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:43.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Christopher O'Connell has played against opponents with an average rank of 124.57 while Nerman Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 323.83.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Christopher O'Connell has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nerman Fatic has won 81% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Christopher O'Connell has converted 27.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nerman Fatic has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Christopher O'Connell vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. O'Connell vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. O'Connell	Stats	N. Fatic
5	H2H Matches Won	0
10	Sets Won	1
66	Games Won	37
10	Aces (Total)	12
7	Total Double Faults	16
1:46:43	Average Match Time	1:46:43
67% (218/327)	1st Serve %	69% (255/369)
72% (156/218)	1st Serve Win %	60% (152/255)
56% (61/109)	2nd Serve Win %	36% (41/114)
42% (21/50)	Break Pts Won %	30% (6/20)
48% (176/369)	Return Points Win %	34% (110/327)
100% (4/4)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/4)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (4/4)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/4)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/4)

Recent Performance Stats

C. O'Connell Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Jinan Challenger - 06-10-2025
R1 Liam DraxlL. Draxl	L	4-6 1-1 ret.	Stats
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai - 29-09-2025
R2 Denis ShapovalovD. Shapovalov	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
R1 Damir DzumhurD. Dzumhur	W	6-2 6-4	Stats
China Open - Beijing - 22-09-2025
Q1 Botic Van De ZandschulpB. Van	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Chengdu Open - Chengdu - 15-09-2025
QF Alejandro TabiloA. Tabilo	L	4-6 7-5 6-2	Stats

View All

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Federico ArnaboldiF. Arnaboldi	L	7-5 4-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Fabrizio AndaloroF. Andaloro	W	6-4 6-6 ret.	Stats
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

C. O'Connell vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. O'Connell	Stats	N. Fatic
60.18% (411/272)	YTD Win/Loss	58.47% (404/287)
59.15% (941/650)	Sets Win/Loss	57.49% (890/658)
53.13% (8145/7185)	Games Win/Loss	53.03% (7602/6734)
58.88% (199/139)	Hard Win/Loss	51.19% (43/41)
64.26% (169/94)	Clay Win/Loss	61.00% (341/218)
55.00% (22/18)	Indoor Hard W/L	43.48% (20/26)
50.00% (21/21)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
0.44	Aces Per Game	0.23
3300	Aces Total	1598
0.15	Double Faults Per Game	0.22
1150	Total Double Faults	1517
1:28:8	Average Match Time	1:20:1
439.51	Average Opponent Rank	509.47
63% (26886/42843)	1st Serve %	66% (23791/35820)
72% (19224/26886)	1st Serve Win %	65% (15579/23791)
51% (8187/15957)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (5772/12029)
41% (1640/3965)	Break Points Won % (Total)	47% (1969/4222)
38% (16373/42543)	Return Points Win %	43% (15618/36165)
38.89% (14/22)	Slam W/L	20.00% (1/4)
43.48% (20/26)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	40.00% (4/6)
52.78% (76/68)	Main Tour W/L	25.00% (3/9)
61.57% (141/88)	Challenger W/L	52.89% (119/106)
70.18% (160/68)	Futures W/L	63.24% (277/161)
62% (394/632)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	60% (394/662)
40% (14/35)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/3)
60% (153/257)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (79/156)
48% (92/192)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (102/189)
88% (416/364)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (394/348)
12% (416/49)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (394/42)
18% (267/47)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (297/57)